Thanks AISI.
I also just spent a while myself digging around and reading up on it. I should have done that in the first place, but wondered if someone had some specialised knowledge.
That excursion into corporate board policies has emphasized much more in my mind the significance of this Buchler thing.
This is the only thing short of a contract between the two companies that could possibly attest to a strong business relationship. Simple as that. They're doing business. KMI is going to adopt the AOT, try to eventually take over QSEP, buy the rights to the AOT, or some version of one of those options.
I cannot discern any other plausible scenario for this. Buchler's boss does not say "Oh yeah sure, go serve on the board of the penny stock company whose technology we tried and which never worked out because it's a load of trash and which is therefore going to go bankrupt. Go for it. Just don't spend too long and don't destroy our reputation!!"
Yeah, right.
It's game on, people.