InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Bullwinkle959

09/06/06 10:58 AM

#912 RE: ihubposter #911

It's a fair question for Sprint at the very least.

And they obviously felt MVC's was the superior product from every single aspect that counted. As do all the other companys that have ignored the "superior" technology that One Voice brings to the table. The answer to this conundrum is relatively simple. One Voice is obviously not superior to many, if any, of the competitive VR systems out there. They never have been or the PPS would still be in the $20 range or much higher.

I hear the constant excuses for the lack of business and rollout failures that are as varied as the new "future" product placements that always pop up to replace those failed ones the excuses are being formulated to dismiss. The company is unknown, the company is being held back by dark, evil, unseen forces dedicated to destroying it for no apparent reason, it is "someone else's" fault execution of yet another venture evaporates. Seven+ years, nothing has worked out? What are the odds one might wonder? You'd think by mere chance something might have been successful.

No, ONEV is unsuccessful because many other VR products are simply better...or more reliable....or better priced...or make more sense. Period. In all the world of technology...all the planet, there is no individual or investment group or other VR company that will step in and bankroll ONEV? Buy the company? Merge with the company? In seven entire years, through the formation and into the maturing of a huge industry like VR? No one?

When you look outside of the daily pumping drone of those entities obssessed with explaining away common sense and rational thought
icon url

igotthemojo

09/06/06 11:18 AM

#913 RE: ihubposter #911

i think honda is superior to ford..why does anyone buy a ford?..many reasons..all the usual ones..all the ones you can think of..and then some....we dont need all the carriers..but we do need some..
icon url

venomen2002

09/06/06 9:53 PM

#916 RE: ihubposter #911

Ihubposter..You are comparing
two types of similar but different technologies which also includes a huge difference in how each are delivered..Again I will say that VR handset technology has been around for a long time now..VAD services on handsets is almost common place in the U.S. Almost every single carrier that I know of offers to their customers various handsets for sale that have many different technologies including VR..MVC..offers a very limited email send feature for various handsets which they host..It is much easier to go to a carrier and say please include our features on your various handsets and will take care of customer support..Where Onev is selling a carrier based solution that is offered to their entire sub base..In the latter scenario..You have to prove to the carrier a number of things..First and formost..is it a revenue producer for them?? What is the proven take rate..What are the customer support issues since the carrier handles those issues..How is it marketed and many more items including integrating it with all of their other services including voicemail..How do you do that without a proven track record of other carriers already using it?? There is no evidence whatsoever that Sprint has said we don't think that Onev's tech is any good so lets go with MVC..To the contrary what we have seen is Onev take over contracts of another VR company with similar tech because the tech is that much better..Why haven't we seen the big carriers say "Yes" yet??..Because they do want to see if it works and how much they will make..That is why Onev has been working with these small carriers to build a case for inclusion to the larger carriers..The process of getting a small carrier to sign is simple..You go to the head of the company..you show them the tech and they say we will test it and then they sign..In a carrier like Telmex you have 12 to 15 levels of sign offs and testing..This technology impacts the whole carrier not just some top of the line handsets which can be made by other manufactures..Onev's tech can be used by any cellphone or landline phone..That is a huge tech breakthrough..Other than the carriers that Onev has landed..no other carrier offers this type of tech to their whole customer base..Telmex has tested MV..Jacobo has been getting the various levels to sign off..When you hear about Telmex signing on..think about what it means..They will have opened the door to a carrier who is a part of a 100 mil subscriber base..That dwarfs anything in the U.S. and when it happens Onev will have even more to show the larger carriers here...veno