It's a fair question for Sprint at the very least.
And they obviously felt MVC's was the superior product from every single aspect that counted. As do all the other companys that have ignored the "superior" technology that One Voice brings to the table. The answer to this conundrum is relatively simple. One Voice is obviously not superior to many, if any, of the competitive VR systems out there. They never have been or the PPS would still be in the $20 range or much higher.
I hear the constant excuses for the lack of business and rollout failures that are as varied as the new "future" product placements that always pop up to replace those failed ones the excuses are being formulated to dismiss. The company is unknown, the company is being held back by dark, evil, unseen forces dedicated to destroying it for no apparent reason, it is "someone else's" fault execution of yet another venture evaporates. Seven+ years, nothing has worked out? What are the odds one might wonder? You'd think by mere chance something might have been successful.
No, ONEV is unsuccessful because many other VR products are simply better...or more reliable....or better priced...or make more sense. Period. In all the world of technology...all the planet, there is no individual or investment group or other VR company that will step in and bankroll ONEV? Buy the company? Merge with the company? In seven entire years, through the formation and into the maturing of a huge industry like VR? No one?
When you look outside of the daily pumping drone of those entities obssessed with explaining away common sense and rational thought