Replies to post #320225 on NeoMedia Technologies, Inc (NEOM)

[Poptech]

Person: What part do you want to know? The contract is posted in the filing.

1. It was not a material agreement.
2. It was a covenant not to sue agreement.
3. It was not a royalty-bearing agreement.
4. The contract prohibited any sale of the patents to pay back YA.
5. It appeared to limit YA's ability to exercise their assignment rights on the patent. It is a possibility that YA released those rights in the Exhibit. If not, the clause would have be unenforceable under the security agreements.
6. Microsoft could not sub-license these rights so they were not a reseller.
7. There was only two payment (the amount set forth...)
9. NeoMedia made no claims on the scope of the patents. This is typical of a CNTS agreement and why NeoMedia likes them so much.
10. The agreement not to sue covers Microsoft and its affiliates which seems to be a whole bunch of companies. Affiliates are not limited to what was likely listed the Exhibits. Anyone who later becomes an affiliate was released from suit by NeoMedia.
http://www.microsoftstore.com/store/msstore/html/pbPage.Help_Site_Affiliate_Program