Replies to post #283 on Nordic American Tankers Ltd (NAT)

[dabonenose]

You made me laugh by your statement"You are clueless".

Did you get stung a little since they reported?

If you did, well that's just the way it goes sometimes.

I never said NAT was a bad company, etc. I only said they had a crappy year, and they did or the pps would have responded in a good way IMO.

However to say someone is clueless and you have no idea who they are, or what their record is,,,,is being clueless.

You are correct that NAT is buying vessels to support the upcoming possible surge in shipping, however, as I said originally,,,Nat had a crappy year in 2016.
That's not to say NAT won't have a banner year in 2017.

As soon as it hits my downside target of roughly 6.80ish, I'll buy it again.

[conix]

Management sure seems to be whistling past the graveyard with their inane press releases. The PR's look like they are appealing to shareholders to keep the faith. That an investment in NAT is still a great one.

LOL...hey MGMT! Check the chart!

[conix]

J-Bear? What are your thoughts about NAT after listening to that Conference Call?

Thanks in advance for any response.

[conix]

J-Bear. You still loving this NAT down here? Or do you feel as I do --that the CEO on the last call sounded like Trump. A "Know it all". Disdainful of anyone who questions him.

Operating under the assumption that he does not make mistakes.

What say you?