InvestorsHub Logo

SOG

04/28/17 9:14 PM

#87506 RE: realsmoka5 #87505

Sorry I wish I could go further on the re-branding theory but I don't personally follow it because it is my belief it won't translate to PPS movement which is the only thing I care about. I also don't believe re-branding for $GEQU is necessary because they don't have a shady past, a complete change in business paths, or polar opposite methods of monetization.

Regarding a reversal and PPS movement north, as I said in the very beginning when all the potential clients were listed and some deals started, $GEQU could easily see .12-.15+ after a break of that .049. Most likely if/when .049 is broken it will run up to .08/.10 drop, consolidate and then start the 2nd phase north which will take it to that .12-.15+ potential.

This will only occur with the help of fins that list the roughly $6 mil equity for DUUO and perhaps one or two other deals. Of course an uplist to a major exchange could happen eventually which would only occur on closing several deals and having multiple IPO's completed successfully or having a group run this stock on mere speculation but holding that long for an uplist or something similar is suicide. Better to wait until those events are closer to unfolding and entering then.

The unfortunate reality of the OTC is that stocks do not run on fundamentals. Instead they run more often group promos and trumped up speculation and/or chart setups.

Out of 31 stocks I called last year in 4 months trading that ran sub penny to multiple pennies, only 2 ran on fundamentals. One of those ran from sub penny to multiple dollars and one ran much like $GEQU did from sub penny to .049. When the numbers lean predominately in one direction like that, you should always pick the most likely scenario to make the most money.