***$AZFL ~ Yes, I like it for a starter position near .001 or less. (since April 21 afternoon when .0007 low was established). We'll see how .0007 holds up. As-is usual with these trades as part of standard contingency plan, I will alert if adding to it a 2nd time, If I deem necessary at some point.
Keep in mind as always~~ We're just trading short term technicals, regardless of fundamentals or other claims of a stock being a 'scam'. No different than past trades on Subpenny OTC. In comparison to successful trades of SCIE & FLSR of recent past (for example), $AZFL is not any more diluted than they were in Jan-March & they were also called 'scams'. We short term trade the technicals of stock tickers that break down to new all-time lows on short term dilutive affect, therefore we don't trade companies. ***We trade 'em, we don't invest in 'em*** >>>We also apply proper, favorable risk/reward strategies to all of these OTC~SubPenny stocks.
I've decided to add to the $AZFL position a 2nd time (as part of standard contingency with these trades) applying the low risk amount concept as described in the original Buy Alert. My suggestion is to initially set limit orders for .0007 & see if that fills (otherwise move up toward .0008).
Although today it tested a new low @ .0006, I'm still confident that this trade will eventually play out higher for us back above .001+ (or .002's) based upon what I'm observing, & that it's therefore prudent to add shares a 2nd time.
This trade has a distinctively similar pattern as previous successful trades $SCIE & $FLSR (back in February-March) prior to them eventually moving up, except more favorable in this case is that $AZFL is not as diluted with outstanding shares as those were.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
