Yes, and until I see here building a sizable % above 1, she has the burden of proof to show otherwise.
Why she is there?
Better Salary as a public company CEO than private?
Hope to achieve something great?
To be clear, not saying she is a crook. I don't believe she is.
But there is a VAST difference between being a hired gun and drawing large salaries and being AN OWNER OPERATOR GETTING RICH FROM SHARE OWNERSHIP WITH INVESTORS,
Even if she is as great as we think she is, whose interests does she promote?
Yours and mines?
Or the person who hired her and will fire her?
What his/their interest and objectives? So far, NOT in building a successful business, as the past track shows.
It's as simple as that.
She must, by here actions show investors she is NOT a pawn but rather someone with power to decide.
How will she do that with close to ZERO holding?
She can't.
Worse, she is not the source of the Tech!
And those that are, own even less.
WATCH the BOARD,
WATCH the INSIDER FILINGS
WATCH the 3 key personas holdings.
WATCH the ratio between cash compensation and % holdings.
When she will know she stands to make 10X here cash income by rise in pps, that's when she will be focused on Investors interests.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
