What about the cancer patients who took the drug for 2.5 years at much more potent doses and more frequently? Some don't seem to understand there is a huge difference between treating for cancer 10+ years ago and what has been learned for memory treatment. The link I posted from today was from 2011. Here's the quote from the article: "Fortunately, this search has been extremely productive, yielding many new drugs that
show no toxicity, are small and not difficult to synthesize, and
address virtually every aspect of AD in the most difficult AD mouse
models of the disease. This PKC activator platform has the following
beneficial effects to prevent and/or halt the progression of:
1. Cognitive Deficits
2. Elevation of Aß
3. Synaptic Loss
4. Amyloid Plaques
5. Neurofibrillary Tangles
6. Neuronal Loss
If someone can show me serious toxic issues since Dr Alkon wrote that article, I'll give it a look. CEO Wilkes said myalgia treated with tylenol.
This trial will bring more clarity than any trial to date in the moderate to severe patient population if objective test scores show statistically significant improvement. That's the advantage of tackling something that few have dared to tackle. If we fail, we fail but it won't be because the science isn't solid. JMHO