If you are paying attention you know the current Kev trial is being conducted with input from (under the guidance of) a potential partner, ie, it was designed to provide data they deem important (and necessary) before moving forward in collaboration. I know you think you would be making better decisions but they are doing exactly what they should be doing.
You'll just have to get over this. I think you still believe the company fumbled Kevetrin's PK analysis and was too ignorant (or negligent?) to alter the Phase 1 protocols, hence these "setbacks and delays", but I believe those were not the cases. Far more accurate I think is that we are progressing forward with Kevetrin as quickly as we can, and it is never quick enough.