To me the opposite is more likely because most arguments Wicks is reproaching to them could have been found with a proper due diligence before buying the asset. TCA is an experienced lender and probably know how to play with the technicality to be on the verge of legality without exposing themselves. More, a quick search told me that TCA have not been sued often in the past couple years, the opposite actually happened more often, which tells me the lender seems, and I emphasis on seems, reliable.
That doesnt mean Wicks is wrong, I've not DD'ed is past yet so I don't know what the man is capable of. I was going to strengthen my position before that thing drop.