LOL I don't post "professional advice" just personal opinion. In any case, I don't know what to make of the name on the COLA but I vaguely recall it being discussed on here sometime back in late 2015/early 2016. Someone with more understanding of the liquor laws (SCM?) could probably weigh in.
But let's be honest, there's never been any lack of reasons to be confused and sceptical about ISBG's ownership of Besado -- from the private LLCs that were set up after the DKTS legal case settled and presumably were used to hold the brands (Besado Tequila LLC and Dziaq LLC and, oddly, Kentucky Tequila LLC), to the mention of "Watr-Baak LLC" and its brand rights in that initial FIMA Inc. PR, to the more basic fact that ISBG has never paid for the Besado brand as promised more than two years ago...
I'm sure it will all be explained in the audit ;)
In the meantime, here's some excellent DD by a fellow poster from back in March 2015, when things were just as confusing and murky and uncertain as they are today. Note the bits about "Watr-Baak Holdings," a private company controlled by Pierce that held... well we don't really know...