InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

JimLur

03/31/17 4:40 PM

#267502 RE: fuagf #267461

fuagf,

U.S. Steel ramps up on spending on mills

U.S. Steel will ramp up spending this year on improving the efficiency of its plants, president and CEO Mario Longhi told analysts this morning during a call discussing the Pittsburgh steel producer’s $440 million loss last year.

Mr. Longhi also told them he is encouraged by President Donald Trump’s early efforts to bolster American manufacturing and protect U.S. companies from unfairly traded imports.

U.S. Steel will spend about $200 million more this year on a series of small projects designed to improve the quality and quantity of steel its mills can produce, Mr. Longhi said. About 40 percent of the projects will cost less than $10 million, the company said. The work will be completed over at least three years.

The steelmaker did not disclose how much it spent on similar work last year.

One particular area of focus is rolling mills that process sheet steel into higher value products. The work will address problems at the mills that limited production during the third quarter, the company told analysts.

Mr. Longhi, who last week was named by the White House as one of the CEOs who will advise Mr. Trump on creating manufacturing jobs, said he is pleased with the actions of the new administration.

“The president is remaining true to his promises during the campaign,” he said. “This administration, they are saying all the right things.”

When asked whether Mr. Trump will propose an import tax on slabs that U.S. steel producers routinely buy from foreign competitors, Mr. Longhi said, “It’s hard to tell right now.”

He declined comment on reports that U.S. Steel is seeking a buyer for its operations in the Slovak Republic. Last year, those operations reported earnings before interest and taxes of $185 million vs. the $3 million loss generated by the company’s North American sheet mills.

The steelmaker’s fourth quarter results reported late Tuesday topped analyst estimates.

U.S. Steel posted a fourth quarter loss of $105 million, or 61 cents per share. Stripping out one-time charges, adjusted earnings totaled 27 cents per share vs. the 1 cent per share analysts were expecting.

The $440 million, or $2.81 per share, loss for all of 2016 marks the seventh unprofitable year for U.S. Steel since 2009, the year the Great Recession hit bottom. The company reported net income of $120 million in 2014.

http://www.post-gazette.com/business/pittsburgh-company-news/2017/02/01/With-eye-on-efficiency-U-S-Steel-boosting-mill-spending-by-200M/stories/201702010204?pgpageversion=pgevoke
icon url

fuagf

08/24/17 1:35 AM

#271551 RE: fuagf #267461

Analysis of 187 documents concludes Exxon “misled the public” on climate change

"Fact check: Trump keeps claiming he created U.S. jobs since Election Day. Not so."

“Read all of these documents and make up your own mind,” ExxonMobil said.

Megan Geuss - 8/24/2017, 11:40 AM


Enlarge / Oil processing towers and gas processing infrastructure stand at the Exxon Mobil Corp.

Dimas Ardian/Bloomberg via Getty Images


A review of 187 ExxonMobil documents .. http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/aa815f , published by two Harvard researchers on Wednesday, has found that the company ”misled the public” on climate change.

The documents included internal papers published by journalists at InsideClimate News as well as 50 “peer-reviewed articles on climate research and related policy analysis” written by ExxonMobil researchers. The oil and gas company made the internal papers public and challenged anyone .. http://www.exxonmobilperspectives.com/2015/10/21/when-it-comes-to-climate-change-read-the-documents/ .. to “read all of these documents and make up your own mind,” accusing journalists of cherry-picking data.

Geoffrey Supran and Naomi Oreskes, from Harvard's Department of the History of Science, took up that challenge, comparing the information in the documents cited by ExxonMobil against the information conveyed in the publicly-available advertorial columns published by the company on anthropogenic (or human-caused) climate change in the New York Times. They found that “83 percent of peer-reviewed papers and 80 percent of internal documents acknowledge that climate change is real and human-caused, yet only 12 percent of advertorials do so, with 81 percent instead expressing doubt.”

The research comes at a tricky time for ExxonMobil, when Attorneys General from 17 states as well as the officials at the Securities and Exchange Commission have launched investigations of the company .. https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2015/11/exxon-mobile-probed-for-misleading-investors-over-climate-change-risks/ .. due to allegations that ExxonMobil misled the public and investors on the risks of anthropogenic climate change. Recently, investors voted that the company .. https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2017/05/exxon-investors-clash-with-executives-vote-in-favor-of-annual-climate-report/ .. should produce an annual report on the risks that climate change policies might pose to ExxonMobil’s global businesses, despite opposition from the company’s executives.

https://arstechnica.com/science/2017/08/review-of-documents-suggests-exxon-mobil-misled-public-on-climate-change/

.. is always good to see shareholders holding company executives to account ..