Replies to post #24890 on Worlds Inc (WDDD)

[BigDawgGMoney]

Sorry meant to say Bungie being privy to the petitioner (obviously not WDDD) just wanted to clarify the error.

Thus, for WDDD we must be able to argue that WDDD is a real party in interest (still), or a 'privy' to the petitioner. Therefore, from my read there will still be a hurdle to clear.