Replies to post #39092 on Voip Pal Com Inc (VPLM)

[GTCar]

You are not the person who is wrong, April 24th was the original date for the Petitioners reply. Through a joint motion, it has been agreed upon to move this date to May 17th... Below is the original scheduling order, I have included in bolded red the new dates...I would also anticipate that they will move the DUE DATE 3 once 2 is completed. I hope this clears things up!

DUE DATE 1 ..................................................................... February 10, 2017
Patent owner’s response to the petition
Patent owner’s motion to amend the patent

DUE DATE 2 ........................................................................... April 24, 2017 May 17, 2017
Petitioner’s reply to patent owner’s response to petition
Petitioner’s opposition to motion to amend

DUE DATE 3 ............................................................................ May 22, 2017
Patent owner’s reply to petitioner’s opposition to motion to amend

DUE DATE 4 ............................................................................ June 12, 2017 June 14, 2017
Motion for observation regarding cross-examination of reply witness
Motion to exclude evidence
Request for oral argument

DUE DATE 5 ............................................................................ June 26, 2017
Response to observation
Opposition to motion to exclude

DUE DATE 6 ............................................................................... July 3, 2017
Reply to opposition to motion to exclude

DUE DATE 7 ............................................................................. July 20, 2017
Oral argument (if requested)

[VVVVVV]

No problem. You could just look back at the original three month time line for both Response dates. The next three to four months are crucial for any possible settlement, prior to oral arguments. If not, we're going to a final written decision.