Replies to post #245845 on Hannover House Inc (HHSE)

[Anvil]

Not even close to the ballpark,,,,I see 2k there for infringement of JBP's copyright....

b). With respect to the litigation filed by the D.C. event photographer, as stated repeatedly in this blog and in disclosures, there was never any authorization granted for the filing of a copyright in the work-for-hire images taken at a HHSE Screening event. The case has been formally dismissed by the court.

Just another " pesky " fact.....

And is there a link stating the court ruled there was no copyright infringement? Of course not, just a clown blog. In terms of monetary settlement, should be detailed in nexts Form 10.

Just like filing a complaint against the Amity attorney. Or filing for sanctions and refund from FFI.

Just fodder for the gulliable.

[downthehatch]

Here's another "pesky" fact:

In order to have a work-for-hire, as Eric the prevaricator claims, you have to actually hire- and PAY- the photographer. Eric NEVER paid for the work, so there never was any work-for-hire.