InvestorsHub Logo

elbiatcho1

03/24/17 3:06 PM

#1550 RE: Alan Brochstein #1549

Attending that conference was yet another example of the stupid decisions of the prior management of this company.


Interesting that the whole entourage "EFFECT" was brought up because isn't that Israeli based ideology?

And that Florida wallstconference that was created by Jason Yako/Stern Lyons, he "serves as one of the senior Jewish Liaisons to the Republican Party"?


http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/news/general/202523/senator-graham-has-israels-back-say-jewish-activists-following-meeting-over-iran.html



They're definitely jumping on that Israel decriminalization bandwagon.

ccsykes

03/24/17 3:59 PM

#1557 RE: Alan Brochstein #1549

They couldn't even raise the full $1mm that they promised Alamo CBD



Please go back and read the original agreement Alan. It never said we have to raise $1M, the agreement said the following:

The Prospective Buyer will be required to raise, as necessary, up to $1,000,000 in capital by February 15, 2017



"As necessary" Alan is not promising to raise a full $1M. It's promising to raise what is necessary to complete the transaction which is what was done.

You praised Surna for raising money slightly below the market, yet criticize us for not raising an amount we were never even required to in the first place, but did so at an even smaller discount.

Your comments continue to be read by your members.

ccsykes

03/24/17 4:07 PM

#1558 RE: Alan Brochstein #1549

Attending that conference was yet another example of the stupid decisions of the prior management of this company.



Because attending a conference that puts us in front of key Jewish business leaders, when the key science we're developing for is being researched in Israel, that was a stupid decision?

Alan, what do you think will happen if we're awarded one of the three licenses in Texas? Is our current post merger market cap over valued? Under valued?

I would love your insights as a self described cannabis analyst.