InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Tx Girl

03/22/17 2:51 PM

#46538 RE: Starlost #46536

Nothing probably is/was wrong with the previous cans, but since this product haven't been produced in three years I could see needing or wanting to recheck certain processes. My thing is if the quality of the cans and/or ingredients needed to be re verified or adjusted why wait to the very last minute. A lot of this stuff should have been checked weeks if not months ago. Adrian has been in this position for a year and he just now realized adjustments may need to be made after three years.
icon url

Ed the Trader

03/22/17 2:55 PM

#46539 RE: Starlost #46536

"This begs the question, what was wrong with the previous cans?? I thought he had good relationships with all the previous businesses relative to production. Why change what is not broke? I don't get it."

Like I said in other messages, I have FOUR perfectly good unopened cans of DNA energy drinks right here which I purchased in 2014.

Someone else here mentioned that once upon a time, the cans were leaking prematurely... presumably because the contents corroded through the aluminum. So, Adrian may be a bit paranoid about a possible recurrence.

The four cans I have are still just fine. I have no way to know if the aluminum has interacted with the contents on the inside in any manner. However, the cans are still solid on the outside.