Replies to post #8989 on PharmaRoth Labs, Inc. (ROTH)

[old biohf guy]

You state "Not true and IF co-conspirator Hall is there why is there a YIELD?"

You draw a false conclusion. The false conclusion is if Hall did not file the financial report thereby generationg a yield sign, then he must not be with the company.

There are many reasons why the report could be late. Here are some possibilities:

1) He is waiting on some information from Mexico
2) He was out of the country without access to needed documents
3) He was sick
4) The exchange is waiting for payment before posting
5) His computer was lost or stolen
6) There was a death in his family

Any of these could have occurred and Hall would still be the CFO.
Your conclusion, although possible, is only one of many possible scenarios.

[sweetlou]

In response to my post below and other recent posts, I realize that false information is posted and rarely corrected or addressed. I have provided very specific documented examples of false information and the response is "Wow, do you not realize..." As if the proven false information you posted is of no consequence. I will let readers discern their own opinion of why false information would be repeatedly posted. Supporting information is provided below:

You state "You are incorrect" but cannot refute a single statement that I have made because it's all backed up by verifiable information. Here is more definitive refutation of your continuing false statement of hundreds of millions of shares at close to zero cost:

You state "This scam is hiding who controls the vast majority of ownership of hundreds of millions of shares owned and at what price" in response to my post below.

You state "ALL shares outstanding should be listed with name, date, and price paid"

Here is what otcmarkets requires for pink sheets current category. It is taken from pink sheet disclosure requirements at otcmarkets.com for any to reference as desired.

4. Issuance History

List below any events, in chronological order, that resulted in changes in total shares outstanding by the issuer in the past two fiscal years and any interim period. The list shall include all offerings of equity securities, including debt convertible into equity securities, whether private or public, and all shares or any other securities or options to acquire such securities issued for services, describing (1) the securities, (2) the persons or entities to whom such securities were issued and (3) the services provided by such persons or entities.

It is very clear what the pink sheets listing requirements are and any can verify that ROTH meets those with the filed unaudited quarterly and annual reports and other documentation. The following is also obvious to any who read posts on this board:
1. The statement that "ALL shares outstanding should be listed" is repeated and put forward as evidence of fraud if not done.
2. I have asked for evidence of ANY company that lists all current owners of their stock with name date and price and none has been put forward. I wonder why?
3. I have pointed out verifiable information in posted financials that shares issued were 127,500,000 as of 4/15/2010, just before FROI purchased the rights to Sucanon. By the way, financial reports at that time were audited. Shares issued since then have been listed as required with name date and price paid as required above.
4. This information has been available on this board, yet the false claim of "hundreds of millions of shares issued at close to or zero" continues to be made despite the publicly available evidence. Why would that be?
5. Not one shred of evidence has ever been produced to back up the claim of unidentified owners and Mike Irving controlling this company, yet it is continually stated as fact.

Readers, please pay special attention to number 5 as the claim is simply a restatement of unsubstantiated and in most cases, false statements. The share count and issuance go back to 2010 and can be easily verified. I'm still waiting for the list of ALL shares outstanding with name date and price paid for ANY company of your choice since that is demanded for ROTH