Replies to post #12075 on PM&E, Inc. (PMEA)

[floridaboy]

Either word would fit the context properly, just depends how you talk...I would not over think that. Management has been working on avenue that best suits what they have in mind going forward. Either way you say it, it's still gotta be thier baby, or they won't play it appears

[saladbar]

I read it that way as well. This is happening.

[woopwoop]

I believe you are spot on. My thoughts are that we have seen nothing but honesty with this company. Subpennies struggle and grasp at straws for a bounce. Not here. While they are encountering, recognizing, and accepting setbacks, it is for the greater good of the shareholder. Deciding not to partner with a toxic lender, disbanding a partnership with a company that is not legally above board (Dinelly), sharing bad news as anyone who owns a share on any big board stock is entitled to, IMO speaks to the forward looking sustainability of this company. I firmly believe that there is nothing but real transparency going on here that the trained penny trader/ 30% flipper is not accustomed to. In the stinky pinky land, companies have no reason to exercise full disclosure, yet this company has more than once shared information that could negatively impact share price. If all statements thus far have been true, any manufacturing plant, company with the means, knowledgeable and savvy investor, would eagerly take on a company that has preordered aircraft, and potential government contracts. The fact that they do not have the immediate means to produce the plane does not mean that the idea/design is not worth millions.