InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

dbuss90

03/17/17 1:45 AM

#72524 RE: General Grievous #72515

my guess if you had this cancer and nothing on market will not help you would not try it?
icon url

Smallville

03/17/17 8:03 AM

#72551 RE: General Grievous #72515

And, if it is proven?

$1000/share.
icon url

Agad

03/17/17 9:04 AM

#72579 RE: General Grievous #72515

If you are aware of Yehuda Baruch and the management of this company, you would know they leading the Israeli field in medical marijuana. Israel is the birth place and world leader of medical marijuana research.

Now, how is that possible according to you? Israel has only existed since 1948. How is it possible that in such a short amount of time, they are impacting and paving the way for the world in technological an medical advances.

So, back to your point, "a few years" can accomplish the world with a company that has their government behind them pushing them to succeed.
icon url

Lavatime

03/17/17 11:43 AM

#72647 RE: General Grievous #72515

Rick Sampson knew of it...

big pharma would rather have something that doesn't cure...

Looks like someone may be worried it is going to pop like the last time they publicly announced their sell... what was it again... .30-.90 or .60-3.40?
icon url

skitahoe

03/19/17 5:32 PM

#73048 RE: General Grievous #72515

I never said that, but I believe that was the findings in in vitro testing. I've seen many great in vitro tests that didn't pan out in the clinic, but remember, they see their drug as supplementing the SOC, not replacing it.

I believe that big Pharma has largely stayed out of cannabis just as they've stayed out of many new technologies. They jump in with both feet once proof of concept is established. Look at the Genesis of most of the greatest new drugs and you'll find they were developed by tiny biotechs and research institutions, but big Pharma bought the rights before approval and takes most of the credit.

Gary
icon url

JJ8

03/19/17 7:54 PM

#73066 RE: General Grievous #72515

I don't mind at your being 'skeptical' in 'imaginative' thinking on the subject. Interestingly, being naturally a curious mind, I didn't take it as being simply a 'pipe-dream'... as you may have thought somewhat naive or annoying. I still have my own realism filter on of all that I read from whatever source in our modern times.

I find skitahoe's posts in general interesting and good. Posts are often as part of some intellectual challenge but also have some entertainment value imo.

I don't even find annoying 'exaggerated and quite optimistic' price guesses as they bring a smile to me. I know I won't be swayed by them one way or the other. I feel I do my own thing when it comes to my trading/investing.

Given the background of having read several of skitahoe posts, I don't feel this one being too 'strange' given the context and what goes on in the small biotech companies. There was some meaning there, imo.

But of course, you could raise the question of 'how likely that may be' as a cure for cancer. Who cares? How about the overinflated 'price guesses' that appear to have merely 'picked from under a bonnet'? Take it easy, friend. GLTY