My guess is that most posters would like to hang on to as much of the $117 million as possible and cash out ,taking a big loss.
Two other companies who failed to show a profit turned it around for shareholders by changing the business model and transforming the company.
I know, IMX tried this ten years ago and look where it got us. The idea was good ,the execution was poor.
I've seen big losses turn into reasonable profits in a company called TTEG and one that became ESSI. With less assets than we are likely to have they diversified into the cannabis business. It can work . I've seen it work. I've profited from it working . It's nice to play with the houses money for a change. It might not even be necessary to change that stupid name.