InvestorsHub Logo

thehavenots

08/27/06 4:56 PM

#57346 RE: rbtree #57338

but it is also still heresay, technically, and logically.....

"the company has been provided with evidence that the bond is underwritten by insolvent companies and has been assigned to other parties"

where's the proof?

HAVE

janniebgood

08/27/06 5:02 PM

#57356 RE: rbtree #57338

Well, good for you!

I am truly thrilled that you feel justified. That is, after all, what is important here . . . how you feel!

itsmikie

08/27/06 5:12 PM

#57363 RE: rbtree #57338

Additionally, the company has reason to believe that EHLLC and its officers/directors have committed other infractions which are under investigation by the company’s counsel and others. The company intends to pursue all appropriate legal remedies against EHLLC, Paul Harris, Benjamin Stanley and John Walsh on behalf of itself and its shareholders. >>

There ya go again,,, ONLY Half of the story... Please POST,,, "The Rest of the Story"... hmmm You do know what it is,, don't you???

country boy

08/27/06 7:00 PM

#57477 RE: rbtree #57338

'rbtree'

If you do all your DD on BBAN you will find that Mr.harris tried to contact the CEO of BBAN to offer talk about using it into one of the sub. of CSHD. Harris had a deadline to do something, but never got a call back. The shareholders was unable to contact the CEO of BBAN either. This was before BBAN went to the Pink.

The shorting was done before Harris, in fact Harris fired several involved. The ones before Harris was charged and had their day in court.