InvestorsHub Logo

Munchqin

03/11/17 3:29 PM

#13843 RE: powderbum #13842

I should say 'Zero Scientific merits that convince FDA or the insurance companies'. BTW Some random research publications done by independent researchers (these are not proprietary to the company) claims benefits and even those fall far short convincing the FDA or the insurance companies!! You call me liable or whatever at your pleasure, but that doesn't help the pathetic state of this company. So if CM bluffs the first installment payment from the GSA will be in January of 2017 to the shareholders, do you hold him liable or what? Are you paid by the company to do this pumping? You claimed that 2 double blinded study results will be available in February of 2017 to everyone reading this board - are you now liable for transmitting and publishing false and misleading info?