Replies to post #361219 on NanoTech Entertainment Inc (NTEK)

[Hunchbackgeek]

That just isn’t true, Page 17 of 19... 8. B. Of the Disclosure Statement states;

B. Legal/Disciplinary History. Please identify whether any of the foregoing persons have, in the last five years, been the subject of: 1. A conviction in a criminal proceeding or named as a defendant in a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses); none

http://www.otcmarkets.com/financialReportViewer?symbol=NTEK&id=166505

Please do read the legal document for yourselves in the link above.


.

[Zorax]

You made me go look at that sickening site, but I wasn't disappointed. What mitigated gull from the 'founder' the principal himself. Supposedly. No way of verifying. Blaming others as usual.

"Straight from David:

Unfortunately the company could have progressed without me. The problem is that Ted and Aaron tried to hijack the company for their own benefit, and when that failed they saddled the company with some huge problems that could have been easily dealt with had they followed the plan that was set in place when I left. Unfortunately, within 2 months of my leaving Al had to step down due to his cancer, and that really caused issues as he was going to be taking care of things in my absence. With him gone there were a lot of problems that were not anticipated and those guys refused to take my direction or advice.

Fortunately that is all water under the bridge and all we can do is to move forward and fix things. Ivan is fast closing deals and we should have a load of A list content up in short order."