InvestorsHub Logo

Uranium

08/26/06 7:16 PM

#18979 RE: mparker #18976

MP,

I don't see the the part where it is stated in the Q that if the litigation is lost that CHDT could not pay the fine/settlement. Could someone post this text from the Q?

Thanks,
U

was-one4theroad

08/26/06 8:00 PM

#18991 RE: mparker #18976

mparker. The only lawsuit I see on the 10Q is an amended one that had previously been dismissed. I fail to see any hint that they are under a threat of being wiped out.

Can you clear this up please. Maybe you are privy to more detailed info?

Thanks 14t

jjcrunch

08/26/06 8:03 PM

#18993 RE: mparker #18976

MP, thanks for the clarification on this...I may not be able to make it on Monday so I AM HOPING THAT SOMEONE WILL ADDRESS the question on Monday's CC regarding the potential for getting wiped out as MP is alluding to...I still can't find which lawsuit he is referring to and where the CEO says it will wipe us out...never mind this last part, i SEE it in the contingincies section

Sentinel, as someone that is well respected on this board and, since you keep stating that you cannot find a thing wrong with the company, do you have any response to Mp's post and can you address it on Monday's CC...

sbc357

08/26/06 10:59 PM

#19031 RE: mparker #18976

Thank you so much MP for stepping in here and clarifying all this mix-up about your statements.
Boy, I am impressed with your analysis, you definitely know your stuff!!!!
I have been studying through many of your strategies on SHO, and I appreciate all that you offer to us less experienced, but learning, traders.
Thanks again for the help, Both here today, and all the time at SHO.

jk21

08/27/06 4:03 PM

#19098 RE: mparker #18976

thank you mparker. how many days of a sell-off do you anticipate following the 1.5 days of buying. haven't been around for weekend, sorry if i missed this already.