InvestorsHub Logo

Dark-Rider

02/28/17 6:08 PM

#4260 RE: poincianamike #4259

Could be but the financing, as distasteful as it is, shields that to a degree. I'll admit these people have been unsuccessful and have tried to survive by what appear to be scurrilous means but you can't say that isn't the way of most biotechs who don't hit early. You're chasing a scientific home run in most cases and some never hit it. These (DCTH) people may be disorganized, unlucky, bad people and then again they may also have something worth buying by a larger player in the oncology field. Those two factors aren't necessarily mutually exclusive. You can be a complete douche and still have something of value. But I would agree that they are in bad shape unless the news gets a lot better in a hurry in terms of someone making an overt move or there are more specific and significant scientific breakthroughs. If the science is valuable enough they won't have to pursue a partner. Pursuing a partner when it's such a small industry often means you don't have anything real. They'll find you. The results are published. JMO

VApopeye

03/01/17 7:14 AM

#4261 RE: poincianamike #4259

Something is fishy with your story. So you can risk $486-$487 on DCTH? And you own 60% of GMER, a worthless stock - $0.0003/share.
You are displaying a trend of someone that takes a lot of risks. My bet is that you shorted DCTH and your hoping to drive it into GMER territory so you can settle your shorts at a profit and recoup your previous losses.