He said it was favorable to the treasury for obvious reasons he clarifies....DOJ is representing the treasury who won the f$#$ing case and now doesnt have to pay back past dividens.
He doesnt say it like he was happy or anything but like obit said like he was stating facts.
His whole tone was more geared at eliminitaing tax payer risk but leaving 30 year liquidity.....which i sort of think contradicts each other.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
