That's a hard question to answer. Lenders will.....
say yes, and I get their point. The problem is all transactions were done without shareholder approval with Pierce acting as Sole Director.
Let the district court appoint someone(s) to act on behalf of DKTS. But I would say DKTS has as much right to the product as ISBG claims to have.
I filed a complaint with the Florida Bar and Huffman revealed to the Bar, not me, that Klein and Pierce had an agreement that wasn't made public in the court docs. I suspect Klein, pretending to be majority shareholder wrote out a "pardon" for Alonzo for stealing the Preferred A shares from "the box" in the virtual office, issuing himself the Preferred E shares, appointing himself Sole Director without authority, and any other actions he may have taken.
I made the point in my 2nd Bar complaint "agin" Huffman who was representing Alonzo/DKTS that Alonzo had no authority to bring a lawsuit on behalf of DKTS "agin" Lou, and that's when Huffman brought up the sealed agreement, though I can't remember if he used the term "sealed," but he meant for me not to ever see it.
It's an absolute mess, which is how Huffman and Pierce roll.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
