InvestorsHub Logo

FD2you

02/24/17 10:51 AM

#20744 RE: IncredBS #20743

Thanks for your answers to my question. The point I was getting at is that a RS would be a very positive thing in the case of STAU, because at this point any attention to the stock would be a positive.

I did email Corley a week or so ago, but got no answer. I was his go to guy after Johnny, but I think he got tired of me calling him out on his BS. They also banned me from their Facebook page for asking questions about the stock.

The man is not dumb, he just has no skill in running the daily doldrums. He clearly has a place in the company, but needs someone to do the business parts while he basks in his own glory.

I'll get back to emailing more often and will continually mention possible legal action as one of my worries. We clearly don't want to take the nuclear option, but if that's what it takes to get his attention, so be it.

Good luck to us all.

pantherj

02/24/17 3:21 PM

#20745 RE: IncredBS #20743

IMO, Corley has zero interest in any of that stuff. On top of which, putting the stock in order would involve possibly exposing some of his past deeds which were clear violations of SEC regs and his fiduciary responsibilities. Add that to the fact that Corley is a narcissist that is unwilling to share any glory (or money) with anyone. Right now he has 100% control and receives 100% benefit. I think that is the way he likes it and the way he fully intends to keep it.

One can be sure that his lawyers are only interested in his welfare; because he is the one paying their fees. In short, i don't think Corley has, or ever did have, any intention of "straightening out" the stock situation. Shareholders ONLY chance is to sue. Corley knows that ... which is why he has gotten lawyers involved ... and why those lawyers have told him not to talk to you.