I don't thing anything the company accomplished is a unicorn. The unicorns are seen by posters. The ones that have been saying next week since last year.
The company says nothing and does less so they can't have any unicorns.
The facts are that the company said they were doing something over 4 months ago that normally takes about 15-30 days max. It has not been accomplished. That means something is abnormal. What? Nobody knows because the company hasn't said.
That is really all there is to it.
The shareholders here have paid a heavy cost for blindly following this scam. Dan claimed transparency would be given because that is what the shareholders needed to see they were being ripped off.
He has not supplied that transparency at all. The shareholders can't tell the difference between Scott and Dan. They deserve better.
Instead we get told "call Dan" That's no different than "call Merle"
I would not have a problem here if Dan was not speaking through mouthpieces. The CEO has the obligation to communicate to shareholders. Especially when he promises transparency. A shareholder having to call to get any information is not transparency and is not the CEO communicating with shareholders. It's shareholders telling him they are desperate for information. If you have to call the CEO is not doing his job of communication.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
