InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

ZRock

02/22/17 8:23 AM

#48183 RE: El_Jefe42 #48180

think they did just worded it a little different?? Z

"and existing contracts are anticipated to dramatically impact Sigma Labs’ growth trajectory beginning this year.”
icon url

DriftinWayOfLife

02/22/17 8:26 AM

#48184 RE: El_Jefe42 #48180

Alan,

It certainly appears that my request for greater transparency and less opacity did not make it down the line to CW. This pr is only slightly different from the prior info re Morf3d, in that it references contracts in hand rather than a business agreement. Hopefully, more light will shine and the contracts will be lucrative.

Better than nothing, but still minimally transparent.


patience and GLTA
icon url

TedJ

02/22/17 11:15 AM

#48210 RE: El_Jefe42 #48180

"Wish we could get a reasoning behind the choice."

The choice was not Witty's, it was yours by looking at the Ihub news feed. IHub left off the subtitle, GlobeNewswire included it.

Sigma Labs Forms Strategic Alliance with Morf3D

Significant Revenue Potential for 2017

http://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2017/02/22/926334/0/en/Sigma-Labs-Forms-Strategic-Alliance-with-Morf3D.html?parent=926100

icon url

DoDeeDee

02/22/17 12:59 PM

#48223 RE: El_Jefe42 #48180

I love the double-speak Sigma uses to make it appear like there is a contract almost guaranteed. They have used similar wording for the past 4 years.

This is a great line:

existing contracts are anticipated




Are they existing or anticipated? Or do we have an existing contract and that's not even a sure thing? These guys are shady at best.

Lots of love to my Sigmaland cohorts ;)