How does this affect Fairholme in Sweeney's court?
Judge Sweeney will read the opinions. However the opinions and rulings may not have much effect since the claims and requests for relief are significantly different, that is, declaratory and injunctive complaints versus 5th amendment taking complaints. Also, The CADC rulings were made along clearly political/government ideological lines. That is, the majority expressed deference to the FHFA and Treasury perspective and narrative. The emphasis on government versus emphasis on the rule of law. Where does Sweeney fit in this. What ideological flavor tastes best to her?