What the analysis does not include is the value in return for the $60B retained capital. Which should yield another 3-5B in net income per year.
So, either way in Tim's analysis the Share price is perhaps 25% more.
Thus the range should be greater.
But, for the same reasons he concludes that the fight over the warrants would prolong the finality, I too have reasoned for so long that the warrants would have to go the way of the west, otherwise they matter at hand can't be resolved for another 10 years.
Thus, I still believe the warrants are dead, and my only guess is the big fishes are going to have to settle this with some side agreements, plus a big NDA.
Peace!