Replies to post #387940 on Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[jacklanvo99]

A federal appeals court ruled Monday that the Treasury Department will have to hand over more documents to investors of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac related to its profit sweep of the two government-sponsored enterprises.

Under the 2012 agreement, the GSEs must hand over all profits to the U.S. Treasury, but investors have sued the government, claiming that arrangement is illegal.

The Federal Housing Finance Agency and Treasury Department have provided the investors with more than 48,000 documents related to the sweep agreement, but have so far successfully held back other documents it claims are too sensitive to release. On Monday, an appeals court upheld a lower court ruling to release 50 of the remaining 58 net worth documents.

It's not clear what the documents will reveal, but attorneys for the investors praised the ruling.

"The Appeals Court declared that the government can keep only four under 'presidential privilege' and four under 'deliberative process privilege away from shareholders' lawyers," wrote Investors Unite, a group representing the investors, in a press release.

The Treasury Department could not be reached for comment.

http://www.nationalmortgagenews.com/news/compliance-regulation/appeals-court-rules-against-treasury-in-gse-case-1095997-1.html

[jacklanvo99]

If You Go Long Fannie and Freddie, You’ll Lose

If you’ve been following the F&F debacle, you recall that in 2012, the government made the decision to start collecting nearly all of Fannie and Freddie’s profits every quarter – an arrangement that “systematically drained these entities of all value, leaving in its wake two unsound and insolvent zombies-a golden goose for the Treasury and utterly worthless for the individuals and institutions who in good faith invested in them,” according to attorney Theodore B. Olson, who represented Perry Capital, one of the plaintiffs in the ongoing court proceedings.

Any investors who buy F&F now are banking on the fact that the government repeatedly lied in court and court filings – most notably, about the fact that they actually knew Fannie and Freddie were on the road to recovery when they began re-routing funds. (Treasury officials claimed the amendment that allowed them to commandeer Fannie and Freddie’s profits was initially put in place to avoid a “death spiral,” but unsealed documents show that they knew exactly what they were doing.)

In total, there are over 11,000 of these documents available in a case proceeding through the Federal Court of Claims (Fairholme Funds, Inc. et. al., v. The United States), showing that the government lied about its 2012 restructuring of its relationship with F&F.

The Court of Claims case is separate from the one brought in Judge Royce Lambeth’s court where Judge Lambeth ruled against shareholders claiming they were wrongfully deprived of the companies’ profits by the 2012 deal that directed all profits to be paid to the government. That case is now being appealed while the Court of Claims case proceeds.

Arguments for why the government will lose are not based on any solid data, but on the fact that these cases will be tried in the court of public opinion, and that, in the best of all possible worlds, “justice” and “common sense” will triumph.

Justice and common sense aside, the most compelling defense argument the government has is that it had a right to take the profits in the first place. It was not “stealing” from investors; it was using its own property.

The government (i.e. the American people) are entitled to the profits rather than investors who were nowhere to be found when Fannie and Freddie needed a bail out in 2008. The fact that the government lied about what it did does not change the fact that it had the right to take those profits, but the dishonesty highlights the ongoing crisis of leadership in this country and the inexcusable complacency of the citizenry.

Of course, the government’s plan to sweep all of these companies’ profits was foolish. Their period of profitability has come to an end and Fannie and Freddie find themselves with no capital, an intolerable situation. If (when) the U.S. housing market weakens again, the government will be back writing checks. (At some point, you would think our political leaders would be embarrassed by their actions but apparently they are immune to such feelings. When Donald Trump calls our leaders incompetent and stupid, he is right and he can point to the handling of Fannie and Freddie as Exhibit 1.)

The evidence showing that the government lied about Fannie’s and Freddie’s financial condition in 2012, portraying it as much worse than it was, certainly opens the door for a settlement. But it does not mean the government will lose its case. And any bet that it will do so is profoundly misguided.
http://suremoneyinvestor.com/2016/05/if-you-go-long-fannie-and-freddie-youll-lose/