InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

bulldzr

02/08/17 12:30 PM

#264689 RE: fastlizzy #264687

Rosie is a talented comedienne but I'm not sure it would be effective. Rosie's popularity is probably less than Trump's.
icon url

fuagf

02/08/17 6:52 PM

#264700 RE: fastlizzy #264687

Time's Bannon is sure is more suggestive than theirs of Rove was.

TIME Magazine Puts Bannon, Never Axelrod, On Cover
By Jackson Richman | February 2, 2017 | 4:12 PM EST





http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/jackson-richman/2017/02/02/time-magazine-puts-bannon-never-axelrod-cover

As Time's of Trump

Why Time’s Trump Cover Is a Subversive Work of Political Art
Jake RommDecember 8, 2016Nadav Kander / Time Magazine

.. bits ..



The Color

[...]

The Pose .. bit of ..

Trump’s turn towards the camera renders the tone conspiratorial rather than judgmental. There are two images at play here — the imagined power-image taken from the front, and the actual image, in which Trump seems to offer the viewer a conniving wink, as if to say, look at how we hoodwinked those suckers in the front (both Trump and the viewer are looking down on those in front). By subverting the typical power dynamic, Time, in a sense, implicates the viewer in Trump’s election, in his being on the cover in the first place.

The Chair


Nadav Kander / Time Magazine

The masterstroke, the single detail that completes the entire image, is the chair. Trump is seated in what looks to be a vintage “Louis XV” chair (so named because it was designed in France under the reign of King Louis XV in the mid 18th century). The chair not only suggests the blindly ostentatious reigns of the French kings just before the revolution, but also, more specifically, the reign of Louis XV who, according to historian Norman Davies, “paid more attention to hunting women and stags than to governing the country” and whose reign was marked by “debilitating stagnation,” “recurrent wars,” and “perpetual financial crisis” (sound familiar?).

The brilliance of the chair however, is visual rather than historical. It’s a gaudy symbol of wealth and status, but if you look at the top right corner, you can see a rip in the upholstery, signifying Trump’s own cracked image. Behind the bluster, behind the glowing displays of wealth, behind the glittering promises, we have the debt, the tastelessness, the demagoguery, the racism, the lack of government experience or knowledge (all of which we unfortunately know too well already). Once we notice the rip, the splotches on the wood come into focus, the cracks in Trump’s makeup, the thinness of his hair, the stain on the bottom left corner of the seat — the entire illusion of grandeur begins to collapse. The cover is less an image of a man in power than the freeze frame of a leader, and his country, in a state of decay. The ghostly shadow works overtime here — suggesting a splendor that has already passed, if it ever existed at all.
.. much more than i would have seen .. lol .. http://forward.com/culture/356537/why-times-trump-cover-is-a-subversive-work-of-political-art/