InvestorsHub Logo

NASDAQ2020

02/08/17 9:41 AM

#23402 RE: Amigo Mike #23401

President discusses abuse deterrent opiods as the first topic with the nations Sheriff's.




doogdilinger

02/08/17 9:58 AM

#23404 RE: Amigo Mike #23401

Some want a comparison to PCYC which is laughable. PCYC developing new drugs for different forms of cancer and life threatening diseases. A broad pipeline in various stages of development. Partnered with 4 or 5 of the top pharmas in the world on development of their candidates and combination therapies. Compare to IPCI eh ? WRONG. IPCI is nowhere near where PCYC was when purchased.



lmfao what a joke! Provide proof positive of any post ever made on the history of this board that ever once remotely claimed that IPCI is anywhere near where PCYC was when it was bought out!

Hilarious reading the outright false claims you post here Amigo_Mike as PCYC 10 years ago was just where IPCI is today...sitting on potential BILLION dollar pipeline and suddenly attracted a 5 year institutional accumulation wave...and if you don't believe IPCI's also sitting on a potential BILLION dollar pipeline that will soon be attracting a multi-year institutional accumulation wave so be it...but posting false claims that any poster here ever once said the following is beyond hilarious hahahahahaa>>>>

IPCI is nowhere near where PCYC was when purchased

fabius

02/08/17 10:08 AM

#23407 RE: Amigo Mike #23401

Amigo, thanks for your detailed answer.

Just to clarify my thoughts: I'm not a pumper and I wasn't expecting the price to currently be at..let's say 10 (just to put an high number).

But, you have to concede that each step you accomplish towards the target (so reducing the number of uncertain variables) you should expect the valuation to slightly move upward. no?

If you are @ 3 with 2 doses of facalin approved, and then you are below 3@ with all the achievements made over the last 12 months, then it looks illogical. But market can be irrational, we know.

so, do we have the uncertainties you mentioned?; sure we do.

Have uncertain variables been reduced someway over the last months (without going into details) ? Yes, they have.

So it's pretty simple to me: more accomplishments, less uncertainties cannot be equal to LESS value. That's it. IPCI should be at 4 or 4.50, because we are going to close 2017 more than likely with a profit.

I really appreciate your contribution, but please don't get me wrong: it's illogical to progressively reach some milestones and see the company value lower than 3 yrs ago, and being shorted on each good news (which doesn't mean that it should have bounced big and fly).