1. I would say there is sufficient evidence that QMC's dots are just as good as our competitors. I don't know if we are any better or if anybody would notice a difference on a side by side comparison, but we seem to have a good Cd free angle. So I QMC is good there.
2. DK, but Steven should explain this to the shareholders at the meeting and wait to hear.
3. NO, but we just finished validation of our dots, so hope we are included soon to existing supply chains
4. NO, I would imagine that GTG accepted monies from the Chinese government to start the process last year. I doubt QMCA saw a dime. From the sound of the original 2016 PR, GTG comes in an builds then QMCA comes in and produces with a profit split. So our part is still to be played. The only money that should flow our way would be for 2 large processors that might reflect in QMC's books 2nd quarter for a 3rd quarter delivery and implementation.
-We really still do not know how profits shared by QMCA connects to the common shareholder of QMC so it is more difficult to get super excited about China. Sounds good for QMCA. Again if we were selling dots through QMC from here..it would be different.
-We don't really know what happened with board.
-More importantly to me, we really don't understand why the lack of speculative buying after the last PR or why maybe there is so much selling to quell it. What might be something interesting to know is an actuall head count of employees currently with the company. We hear that this and that person were hired...but did they stay? Or did they get tired of shares for payment and quit/sold shares for money? It will also be great to know where the Posners stand with their share count.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
