Sure. I will take a stab. But the present is that there is nothing in any financial statement of funding received from QMCA. In fact, the only thing we have is a PR and 8k announcing he PR to go along with the normal posts on this board.
But to your questions:
Nanosys: The far and away favorite. They have and continue to dominate the market and now have Samsung providing their billions as back up. Contrary to comments on here, they have managed to produce Cad QDs within exemption levels AND according to their press releases - cadmium free! Samsung is blowing everyone out of the water and also was able to aquire QD Vision. So their value is astronomicaly higher than ours I would say. Their only weakness, is a weakness this board has created - batch process. Unfortunately, that doesn't hold much water when they have been the only successful QD supplier for years, have Samsungs backing, and helped eliminate a competitor.
Nanoco: they are in a similar situation as us, but further along in the game. Market cap and values of more than three times ours. Partnered with DOW and Merck. Cadmium Free offerings and loads of funding money. For whatever reason, they just have not made it yet. They have seen revenues from the sales of QDs though, something we have never done.
QD Vision: bought out by Samsung for $70 million. Again nearly triple our current value.
Good arguments for why most still consider us back of the pack. But, but, but....flow reactors, heat resistant, cadmium free! Again, we have ZERO verifiable data on our dots or our competitors. The only ones that can verify quality are the consumers and currently they aren't buying our dots. That's present not past.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
