Well I am sure there are disclaimers with clients when they are on board that they will be listed. I understand I wouldnt want people calling my house based on some claim that doesnt have anything to do with me. But still, a firm needs to stand its ground if they are gonna back its clients. WHere is the public notice to investors to please direct all SLJB questions to the IR firm in question only? I mean its all a matter of professional conduct how you react to, yes, crazy investors who are indeed in a whirlwind of scepticism or have many questions. What I mean is, do you put up such dislaimer/notice, or do you remove the client name? Which looks more suspicious to you? I know what does to me.
I mean in all honestty, I hate to beat this down again, but if they put out a decent website, it wouldnt have raised alot of questions to begin with, and there may not have been "scared", "nellie", etc investors (as some call them) calling, e-mailing to provide some sort of comfort as to the legitimacy of the IR firm, and more importantly, SLJB. This goes back to what I, and many have said, about the importance of credibility in this play. We all know the audited fins and progress towards SEC filings are important in that, but little steps mitigate these problems along the way. Can they really expect people WONT question a website like that?
Todd
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
