That is where it becomes a scheme orchestrated by Fast Eddie.
You are not exactly correct. The two funds that are named in the California lawsuit simply bought the stock. Maciora had his shares sold.
The California lawsuit was filed to illegally stop Maciora from selling his shares. Starrs knew that he emailed the contract that HE SIGNED with Zalunardo to Zalunardo which called for 200,000,000 shares. In order to combat that because he is a piece of garbage, he made up a story that he didn't send the email. Anyone in the world can someone someone an email and then later say that I didn't send it. There is something called IP addresses. It is a lie.
Also, Joe "King Kong Bundy" Elguindy writes in his complaint that the Bruce Smith email created on September 23, 2014 was a draft. No it wasn't. It is obvious to anyone that has a brain what it was. Bruce Smith and yes, Christine Cowan were the authors of an excel document that showed the officers/employees salaries and stock being accrued. And yes, Zalunardo's stock was showed as vested and accrued and expensed. The EXcel spreadsheet that was created by Smith and Cowan was not a draft. It is was a document that they created as per the employment agreements.
The Texas court saw that document. It is interesting that Ed Starrs never once showed up in the Texas court to tell his BS story which he is telling in the Texas case. Why? Because, the Texas judge was a former marine badass and Ed lied to him, he would have thrown his ass in jail in my opinion.
Ed Starrs is a lowlife piece of garbage who doesn't care about anyone except himself. He does not like Maciora because Maciora has held him accountable.
All of this is in the court filings. If Finck and Young and Cowan and John Doe#1 would have read the filings and actually did some due diligence instead of what they did, they wouldn't be in a court of law right now with a multi-million dollar lawsuit filed against them. If you notice, the jerkoff that calls himself The Hammer spills the same garbage about the stocks he's promoting on a number of sites on any weekly basis.
Think about this. Ed's bullshit story in the California lawsuit was never told in the Texas lawsuit. It wasn't even told in the federal lawsuit. Does that make any sense? Any jury in America and anyone will make chopped meat out of Starrs when he gets on the stand.
So Mr. Starrs, is it correct that you fired Zalunardo for cause?
What did he do?
Is it MyECheck's policy to grant someone over $200,000 in stock after they are fired for cause.
Ed will say No
Well that's what happened. It's right in your 10K. Zalunardo was granted 12,000,000 shares.
As you can imgagine, it goes downhill from there.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
