Based on information on how testing was conducted by Hound Labs, one could argue if the participants right to privacy was compromised or if any individuals rights were violated in the process.
Similar unregulated field testing was performed recently by a Canadian insurance company studying the effects of impaired driving. "MPI is facing considerable criticism for its decision to ask participants stopped by police in a random checkstop to participate in the drug-use research. Some view the research design as "coercive and invasive". Subjects were asked to voluntarily submit breath and saliva samples and were asked a series of invasive questions.
Basically, scientific trial studies are engineered to follow strict protocols that are overseen and controlled by a credited governing agencies. Product certification testing is seldom performed in house but conducted by independent third party laboratories.
To claim Hound Labs has completed testing is ridiculous.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
