InvestorsHub Logo

es1

01/31/17 11:59 PM

#116834 RE: rayovac812 #116829

Not sure which assertion you are speaking of.
Sounds to me like they are improving the MS line with some of the DS traits which is a good thing.
If you remember MS was said to be extremely smooth I think they are looking for a very strong and still flexible enough to be very hard to rip and still be as smooth as MS.
Wouldn't work well for any sort of ballistic protection but would be great sports wear fiber or high end fashion.

I think spiderpiller is probably not a very strong fiber compared to the others but because it is 100% spider silk proteins it would be able to be used in surgery and medical implants. I think that is the whole reason to come up with a pure spidersilk protein fiber.
Jazz can correct me if I am assuming wrong but we would only have a(few) protein and not all of them in the right order to make actual spider silk.
But since spider silk is inert, which specific protein wouldn't make much of a difference.
Spidersilk is the whole alphabet but Spiderpiller is just a string of vowels.

JMO
(A wild guess)

bananarama

02/01/17 9:05 AM

#116855 RE: rayovac812 #116829

"Good information in this one. Not sure why there is early criticism."

EXACTLY, Rayo. This was the most informative newsletter to me. As just one example, I finally learned what happened to BR. At the very least, that was great information.

We now know that we are searching for a second international location and that Vietnam is looking more and more like it WILL get done, as I have been saying.

Any criticism regarding this newsletter is unjustified, IMHO.