Let me know if I am reading it correctly. Search IFAN in the article and it bring to you where it shows this.
Another theory I have is that IFAN which, owns the technology via patents and pending patents, is that it earned the $268k from licensing...but not from themselves putting it into market, perhaps a major retailer or larger firm bought the rights (licensed) from IFAN and has been using another name for it, or no name for is if a specific retailer such as a Walmart is using it for their own use.
That may explain such a large revenue is such a short period of time, as well as to explaining why we cant find users of it in the marketplace.