Right on, Jackle. You beautifully summarized my own thoughts about the scenario that will hopefully play out over the coming year. Specifically, OEM X begins to offer PR3D to its customers, and the software works as advertised and is viewed by customers to be cost-effective in providing necessary validation of the build. Word gets around the 3D printing community, and now when prospective customers of OEM Y (which doesn't currently offer PR3D or an alternative validation solution) inquire about how they can accomplish this function using OEM Y's machine, OEM Y realizes that they need to contract with SGLB to offer the same option to their customers. There are still some "IFs" embedded in this scenario, specifically that PR3D does the job (which I think the DARPA grant and new contract together strongly support) AND that the need for this solution becomes more and more apparent to end-users. As a LONG for the past several years and deep in the hole like many of you, I am happy with today's news and am cautiously optimistic that this heralds much better times to come.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
