Replies to post #297085 on Plastic2Oil Inc (PTOI)

[fourkids_9pets]

i've always noted that RH needs better communication with P2O investors

to this day when i log onto P2O's website and note *last updated* in March 2016 ..
i want to smack P2O's mgmt upside the head .. seriously

http://www.plastic2oil.com/site/home

that said

i know of about 20 actual P2O investors who consistently press for input
out of RH .. myself included

imo P2O is on the cusp .. but i also recognize what P2O themselves control
and what they don't re: the first buyer/s of P2O's disruptive tech

which is why i was appreciative of what the state of Indiana's announcement
in late November 2016 .. revealed re: both realistic time lines and monies
anticipated to be expended on this emerging sector for *one site* in one state

same with TMR's analyst report out on 12.22.16

documentation was always for my edification (learning curves) it's my
version of *charts*

interestingly for me out of the EOY Shareholder Update was noting RH's
*content overlap* of the March 2016 and September 2016 Updates

i have to wonder if one of investors' conditions in one of the *southern sites*
pertains to the price of oil remaining above $50.00 for X amount
of time (1 or 2 Qs) ..

personally i think RH is very *aware* of actual P2O investors in 2017
and does understand that P2O's largest asset currently .. is PTOI's
abusive short .. do i think RH will ever acknowledge that.. NO i don't

even RH imo recognizes that PTOI's PPS has been relentlessly compressed
for 4 years effective this month .. could he have handled aspects
differently? .. bringing in OBG and a sales and marketing team first
vs going the route of ECO .. sure .. but i'm not sure intent was to keep
NF initially .. which i can also understand if indeed was the case

as of last month's UPDATE .. i do believe that NF will come back on line
and that is based on the blending site being leased vs sold ..

so what is the true cost of bringing NF back on line .. and what brings that to fruition in 2017

imo P2O's first sale does .. which will of course *impact* PTOI (stock)
but i also don't rule out ancillary material events noted by RH in 2016
also impacting PTOI (stock)

and this is where it may be just me .. but i'll take P2O's *ability
to control* .. i.e. being *proactive* vs being reactive to events mgmt
does and doesn't control

i have no issues with PTOI (stock) sitting with *low* to *no* volume in this PPS range for as long as it takes P2O's mgmt

PTOI ..

 Previous Close 
 01/17/2017	0.032 
 52-Week High 
 09/13/2016	0.07 
 52-Week Low 
 08/09/2016	0.018 
  
 Price Performance (Last 52 Weeks) 
 01/17/2017	+28.00% 
  
 Volume	0 
 Volume (10 day Average)	12,322 
 Volume (90 day Average)	79,413 

as angst producing to CEs as it is .. P2O continues to file .. update
their Shareholders and figuratively keep their doors open .. it isn't
being done for the fun of it .. imo there is (and has been) a plan ..
or as i've noted previously (path pursued) what it entails specifically .. only RH knows

it makes far more sense to have that imo than *volume* done to entice new eyes

zero doubts there will be an 8K filed (material event) that impacts
PTOI as a totally *positive* event (for actual P2O investors) in 2017
what i don't know is the timing of that 8K and whether the 8K that
is perceived as a positive for *retail* pertains to P2O's first sale
or another material event implemented by mgmt

4kids

[flptrnkng]

Ha! Heddle is marking time until next year

when he'll sell the shell back to Bordynuik, who will use it to fleece a whole new set of rubes.

Next up on Heddle's schedule: another 'delay' with the latest 'customer'.

[jobynimble]

The shorts have been in trouble since the stock price was trading in dollars and still no hurry to cover...

That's if you believe in fairytales...

[underdog150]

Seriously, anyone who has been Dca'ing shares of PTOI on the hope of a short squeeze of this pig has never done a simple history search on Ihub.
10 years of claims on many forums have led every single long who believed the bulls$it with untold losses.
The train wreck that is PTOI has been barreling toward investors since inception, yet some still believe buying more shares lower every year is solid investment advise.
Believe as you wish, but history says you WILL lose *ALL* your investment, like every other promo that was *documented*
-----------------------
3 options for CEs

1 .. stall PTOI (stuck in the 03 to 04 pps range) ..
2 .. *run* PTOI for *volume* .. and pray like hell *news* doesn't coincide
3 .. actually *scrounge* (god knows if this is the best that can be done
with 3 days for calls) PTOI shares to *feed* legit bids .. bids will
*continue* to stack on PTOI (respective caveats met) which in turn
will raise PTOI's bid from actual P2O investors ..



With all due respect...

Heddle needs to put the notion of these CE's to rest... at the very least in perspective... by....

actually PRODUCING A MATERIAL EVENT!!!!

one that creates revenue...
one that moves the stock price...
one that makes investors want to invest...
one that makes investors HAPPY they invested....
one that signifies PTOI is in the game....
one that is impressive enough...he doesn't wait until the last possible day of an extension period to tell the world...

not a miracle...not something off the charts...just something investors other than longs (who have no choice but do or die) can sink their teeth into...

I'm not in disbelief of the naked short position...it's there...nothing WE can do about it....but Heddle can; He needs to produce!