Replies to post #45385 on Secure Point Technologies Inc (fka IMSCQ)

[tcm7]

Agree that the EC probably has this somehow included in their plans. Just suggesting that there is so much depth to the actions of both PP and our X management.
Franky could come clean for his company's safety. GB should. L3 could be worried about appearances of their actions too. This all may be brought up during the Jan 20 court IF there is NOT some settlement/major reduction of usury debt before then.

This BK is still between IMX shells (Securepoint) and PP/other creditors. I still think a possibility remains to settle out of court. The charges that the EC will bring Jan 20 carry serious offences, IMO, so I would still believe it is in PP's interest to avoid a drag out court hearing where many questionable things may be brought up.
I hope all this stink ruins the Mcscam team's value to L3. As you said the L3 offer was negotiated for a Long time, probably before Mar 16 and definitely by June 16.
Plenty of stink there.

[rettacs]

management was happy for any deal that would pay off the debt, and didn't care if there was any left over for shareholders.

Change "debt" to "CIC" and you got it.

Sure wouldn't want to swap places with them when it was time to face St. Peter.