Jared Kushner, a Trump In-Law and Adviser, Chases a Chinese Deal Donald J. Trump officially announced his campaign for the presidency at Trump Tower in Manhattan on June 16, 2015, with his daughter Ivanka and her husband, Jared Kushner, at his side. Wu Xiaohui, the chairman and chief executive of Anbang Insurance, a Chinese financial behemoth which owns the Waldorf Astoria hotel and controls as much as $285 billion in assets. JAN. 7, 2017 On the night of Nov. 16, a group of executives gathered in a private dining room of the restaurant La Chine at the Waldorf Astoria hotel in Midtown Manhattan. The table was laden with Chinese delicacies and $2,100 bottles of Château Lafite Rothschild. At one end sat Wu Xiaohui, the chairman of the Waldorf’s owner, Anbang Insurance Group, a Chinese financial behemoth [ https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/02/business/dealbook/anbang-global-shopping-spree-china-mystery-ownership.html ] with estimated assets of $285 billion and an ownership structure shrouded in mystery [ https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/02/world/asia/china-anbang-insurance.html ]. Close by sat Jared Kushner, a major New York real estate investor whose father-in-law, Donald J. Trump [ http://www.nytimes.com/topic/person/donald-trump ], had just been elected president of the United States. It was a mutually auspicious moment. Mr. Wu and Mr. Kushner — who is married to Mr. Trump’s daughter Ivanka and is one of his closest advisers — were nearing agreement on a joint venture in Manhattan: the redevelopment of 666 Fifth Avenue, the fading crown jewel of the Kushner family real-estate empire. Anbang, which has close ties to the Chinese state, has seen its aggressive efforts to buy up hotels in the United States slowed amid concerns raised by Obama administration officials who review foreign investments for national security risk. Now, according to two people with knowledge of the get-together, Mr. Wu toasted Mr. Trump and declared his desire to meet the president-elect, whose ascension, he was sure, would be good for global business. Since the election, intense scrutiny has been trained on Mr. Trump’s company and the potential conflicts of interest [ https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/26/us/politics/donald-trump-international-business.html ] he will face. But with Mr. Kushner laying the groundwork for his own White House role, the meeting at the Waldorf shines a light on his family’s multibillion-dollar business, Kushner Companies, and on the ethical thicket he would have to navigate while advising his father-in-law on policy that could affect his bottom line. Unlike the Trump Organization [ https://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/25/us/politics/trump-organization-business.html ], which has shifted its focus from acquisition to branding of the Trump name, the Kushner family business, led by Mr. Kushner, is a major real estate investor across the New York area and beyond. The company has participated in roughly $7 billion in acquisitions in the last decade, many of them backed by opaque foreign money, as well as financial institutions Mr. Kushner’s father-in-law will soon have a hand in regulating. The Anbang talks, which have not previously been reported, began roughly six months ago — “Well before the president-elect’s victory,” Mr. Kushner’s spokeswoman, Risa Heller, noted. That was, however, just as Mr. Trump clinched the Republican nomination. While the talks are far along, representatives for Mr. Kushner said some points remained unresolved. Ms. Heller declined to outline the financial terms under discussion. [...] http://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/07/us/politics/jared-kushner-trump-business.html [with comments]
Judge signs off on $26 billion T-Mobile and Sprint merger. Now what?
----- " Why Corporations Are Helping Donald Trump Lie About Jobs .. your 2nd down .. excerpt .. "It’s easy to see why SoftBank and Sprint might want to help Mr. Trump take credit for creating jobs. SoftBank’s chief executive, Masayoshi Son, wants the Department of Justice’s antitrust division and the Federal Communications Commission to allow a merger between Sprint and T-Mobile. In 2014 [ https://dealbook.nytimes.com/2014/08/05/sprint-and-softbank-said-to-abandon-bid-for-t-mobile-us/ ] regulators appointed by President Obama made clear to Mr. Son that they would not approve such a transaction because it would cut the number of national wireless companies to three, from four, greatly reducing competition [ https://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/15/opinion/keeping-the-wireless-business-competitive.html ] in a concentrated industry. Mr. Son sees a new opening for his deal in Mr. Trump, who has surrounded himself with people who have sided with large telecommunications companies [ https://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/16/opinion/expect-a-cozy-trump-telecom-alliance.html ] in regulatory debates and have argued against tough antitrust enforcement." -----
A federal court sides with the companies in an antitrust case to block the merger.
Roger Cheng, Marguerite Reardon February 11, 2020 12:48 PM PST
IMAGE - Not married quite yet. Josh Miller/CNET
The end is in sight for T-Mobile and Sprint after nearly two years of waiting to close their $26.5 billion merger. On Tuesday, US District Judge Victor Marrero gave the green light to the deal, rejecting claims that combining the third- and fourth largest national wireless carriers would be anticompetitive.
Fourteen state attorneys general, led by those of New York and California, opposed the transaction and sued in federal court earlier this year to stop the deal. Their argument was simple: Combining the companies would dramatically reduce competition and lead to higher prices for consumers.
But the judge didn't buy this argument, saying that the merger was unlikely to "substantially lessen competition." He said it was "misleading" to presume the deal would be anticompetitive given the rapid changes in the industry.
Consumer advocacy groups disagreed with the judge's ruling.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
