Replies to post #25246 on Bourque Industries Inc (BORK)

[gotmilk]

No problem. I now have confirmation from two independent trusted sources that the information is valid. Neither of these two sources know the identity of the other, and this second source has been proven to be of the upmost reliable type.

Of course I'm able to post here on this public board those four items of extreme interest to the Hurting in the Dark Shareholders since it will take the form of hearsay.

Two items are really just low impact, but the other two when I heard about them made my brain explode with "You gonna be kidding me."

Of these two that are totally unexpected and of serious material, one if true will be investigated and if found to be valid will cause John Bourque some serious legal problems that will be transferred in full force to the Board of Directors. The other one I'm still totally without doubt is something I never would have thought would now happen.

Oops, There was a fifth, but that is something on an ongoing basic here.

Doug

[gotmilk]

"Unless you are a fly on the wall you have no idea what is going on at Bourque Industries and until there is something really to report, it should be that way."

But then, while it's clear that the Hurting in the Dark Shareholders need not know the day-to-day steps Bourque Industries has taken, and is taking, to get its product recognized and validated, the near zero communication to the shareholders results in the shareholders unable to recognize and validate Bourque Industries as a company in the process of getting its product recognized and validated.

I do admit that the following,
http://investsouthwest.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Bourque-Industries-Inc..pdf
to me, is good communication to shareholders even thought it was not published as such.

d