Replies to post #374277 on Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[cfljmljfl]

" what it states. The US Treasury, at its sole discretion, can "blow up the agreement," if a provision is declared illegal or unenforceable (unconstitutional). The covenant speaks for itself. "

Obit, so from this statement, termination awaits the court's "stamp " of " illegality"
or "unconstitutionality " ? Or, since Treasury doesn't have the judicial authority to determine "illegality " or " constitutionality " , does The Treasury have an option or another path where upon he can solely act to terminate the agreement ? If so option exsisted, might this be the quickest path President Trump and Treasure Nominee are referencing ?

[Donotunderstand]

Yes?

but I thought you had suggested it limited the Director from stopping the NWS

and I read the non severable clause to be a standard - if not found legal in part - then the whole can be deemed over if so desired - by the Treasury (purchaser)

For now - in all events - I think a court action (good or bad) on the writ or the appeal will happen before January 20