But two lenders (one admitted by SFRX).....
saying Fudd LIED about the permit? Now we have another claim of someone discussing something with Fudd that can't be published.
Message boards can be for opinions, but as the SEC says, they are often used for manipulation, and BEWARE of the insider information claims.
So what is your opinion on the following**?
*How did the 3 item claim get made 2 weeks before SFRX LIED about it in the PR? It wasn't told to be an opinion, it was said to be information from the FBAR, but that was shot down not only by the Defendant in emails he posted, but in other discovery as well.
*Who told SFRX the Defendant could BAN posters, and why was that told to the Court repeatedly in the original complaint?
They filed a motion based on 3rd party claims (same fellow that made the 3 item claim) HuffPuff admitted he couldn't verify in an email in hopes the Defendant would go to jail, and they told the Court it was to deter the Defendant and OTHERS. They also said those (ahem) posts were made here and made the stock price drop. Turns out the majority of the (ahem) posts were actually "alleged" to be Facebook private messages.
The company doesn't have to be involved as the SEC says, but it's obvious SFRX and/or they agents are. They hired Brock Hubbard to monitor the boards, right?
It's rather pathetic to see a CEO spend resources to "deter" certain individuals when people he does business with says the exact same things, which is FUDD LIED.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
